Financial costs to taxpayers of capital punishment is several times that of keeping someone in prison for life. The endless appeals and required additional procedures clog our court system. It sends the wrong message:
October 21, Gloria Kopp Writing Samples 8 The majority of Americans have a clear and strong stance when it comes to the death penalty, no matter which side of the debate they sit on. Supporters of this punishment argue that it serves as a deterrent to crime, and that justice is being served.
My personal stance on the death penalty is that it is an outdated and ineffective punishment, serving no true benefit to society and causing more harm than good to society as a whole.
When looking at the argument that the death penalty serves as a deterrent to others thinking about committing the same crime, we need only look to other countries around the world as examples to disprove this.
Throughout the world, we are able to see that, in those countries where there is no death penalty, murders and other violent crimes happen at a much lower rate than in the United States.
It does seem counter-intuitive, but the evidence is clear.
We can also clearly see that, in the United States, many people still commit these horrendous crimes, knowing full well that capital punishment exists.
In the heat of the moment, when a person is not thinking clearly and logically, the existence of the death penalty and the possibility that they could be facing this punishment does not typically cross their mind, and cause them to alter their behavior. We can see this in the consistent, and increasing, number of violent crimes being committed year after year in this country.
There have also been widely publicised cases of wrongly convicted individuals, who were either put to death or were awaiting their punishment, that were revealed to be innocent. In the cases where the death penalty had already been carried out, it was too late for those innocent people.
Having even one innocent person put to death wrongly is a crime unto itself. We must also look at the mental competence of the individuals being convicted and sentenced to this punishment.
If a person is not mentally capable of processing and understanding the actions they have committed, it is ethically wrong to execute them for this.
There have been advancements in the technologies being used to enact the death penalty that are designed to lessen the pain and suffering a person endures.
But, in reality, the only individuals who can attest to their effectiveness are those being executed. We cannot say for certain whether or not someone suffered unduly while they were being executed, whether everything worked as it should to ensure a quick and painless death.
And, yes, there are those who will argue that a death marked by pain and suffering is a part of the justice being served. But, as we try to hold ourselves as a nation to a higher standard than our worst criminals, we should at the very least allow our justice system to work as it should, according to the Supreme Court.
And, nowhere in history has the Supreme Court ever advocated for the use of cruel and unusual punishment. We would like to think that we have more compassion and humanity than those who have committed such horrendous crimes, and as such, we should demonstrate this by showing them the humanity they denied someone else, not by sinking to their level.
When we look at the evidence from around the world on the effectiveness of capital punishment as a deterrent, as well as the ethical dilemma of potentially executing innocent or mentally incompetent individuals, it is easy to see that the practice of capital punishment offers no benefits to our society.One of the places with the highest murder rate which can get you life in prison has no death penalty which is Michigan.
That is not the only state the District of Columbia is the same way. The state with the highest crime has only executed one person in the last three years and maybe its because they is not strict enough and the punishments are not . This assignment instructed students to write a persuasive essay which argues for a specific viewpoint or a specific action to be taken on a societal issue.
I argued for a specific stance to be taken on the issue of the death penalty. The audience for this essay is the opinion section of the. The title is Arguments against the Death Penalty yet the author spent the whole time counterclaiming any arguments brought up rather than explaining the logistics behind the arguments.
No side was taken in this essay however the title clearly states that the essay should be on arguments against.
I should tell you at the outset that my opinion is yes and heartoftexashop.com, before I explain that unsatisfactory answer, let me summarize the arguments usually cited for and against the death penalty. Yes, we want to make sure there is accountability for crime and an effective deterrent in place; however, the death penalty has a message of “You killed one of us, so we’ll kill you”.
The state is actually using a murder to punish someone who committed a murder. Death Penalty: Yes or No?
Amanda Nichole Hester ENG Instructor Gary Henry September 28, The debate over the death penalty has been looming over the .