While on your search for the perfect retreat property have you considered things like federal government influence, corruption, gun laws, medical freedom or major nuclear targets? If not, then keep reading! If you are in the process of looking for a home or retreat we urge you to visit StrategicRelocation.
They have not been getting any respect from the Obama administration lately. That is a region where the Saudi-Iranian rivalry is getting hotter.
Since King Salman came to power, he appointed his year-old son, Mohammad, as Defense Minister and the chief manager of his court. In this latter capacity, he is generally regarded as the power behind the thrown. The Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Muhammad Bin Naif, though he holds numerous posts, is not number two in terms of his exercise of power.
Brash Mohammad, it seems, is the second most visible, and ostensibly, the second most influential man in that country. Personalities are important in authoritarian states.
Thus, it is safe to say that defense and foreign policy of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia KSA is being formulated and conducted through the most visible participation of Salam and his favorite son, Mohammad.
First, is the hatred, fear, and envy of Iran. Second, is the Saudi military aggression in Yemen. The Saudis are still in a state of shock that Obama concluded a nuclear deal with Iran, whereby the latter was allowed to continue its nuclear research program.
Now, the Saudis have no choice but to work on a realignment of their foreign policy toward Israel, which hates Iran with equal intensity. However, the chief problem with that alignment is that it may never be made public, given the intensely anti-Israeli environment among the Saudi powerful religious community.
Still, Saudi Arabia may be able to become a little overt about its policy realignment with Israel, in the sense that the same Saudi religious scholars also hate Iran on the basis of their long-standing views of the Shias stemming from Wahhabism.
They are envious of the way Iran became an influential power inside Iraq after the US withdrawal from that country. The United States has long nurtured a strong antipathy toward the Islamic Republic. However, that antagonism is secular in orientation. As such, the United States was open to—and indeed, it sought and concluded—a nuclear agreement with Iran.
Even if a Republican president succeeds Obama, chances are that the United States is likely to keep its doors wide open for negotiations with Iran, for at least two reasons.
Second, as long as the United States continues to seek a political resolution of the Syrian ongoing civil war, Iran will remain an important player around the negotiating table, along with Russia. The United States also knows that there can never be a stable peace in Iraq without active participation and approval by Iran.
In other words, in the making and sustenance of peace and stability in Iraq, Iran is likely to have a definite say.
Washington has begrudgingly accepted that reality, since it knows how destructive an alienated Iran can be in Iraq. The Saudi leaders are watching these developments in Iraq, and all they can do is remain covetously on the sidelines. For its own long-term advantage, Iran must ensure that the Iraqi Sunnis are not alienated.
For that purpose, it also knows that it has no choice but to ensure the emergence of a negotiated power-sharing agreement guaranteeing political participation and economic integration of the Sunnis in the governance of Iraq.
Again, despite being an Islamic Republic, Iran has demonstrated, time and time again, that it is fully adept at negotiating political agreements and deals and then ensuring their implementation, as it has been doing in the enactment of its promises within the nuclear deal.
Regarding the resolution of the Syrian civil war, Iran is likely to remain open to a power-sharing agreement, as long as such an agreement also guarantees its presence in Syria, and provided that agreement does not disturb the current status of Iranian-backed Hezbollah in the Levant.
On the contrary, the only card the Saudis and their GCC allies have in Syria is to back the so-called moderate Islamists.May 31, · Strategic Drift is when a company loses its strategic direction and is no longer progressing towards its goals. This can be avoided by getting into the right cadence.
First you need to create your BHAG in order to better understand your strategy.
The typology is organized in five main sections that can be read in any order based on the reader's interest and familiarity with the subject. Strategic drift can be defined as any situation in which organizations fail to achieve their expected or planned strategic outcome.
Sometimes, different situations including a changing business environment can result in challenges that altogether influence an organization’s strategy. adjective. pertaining to, characterized by, or of the nature of strategy: strategic movements.
important in or essential to strategy. (of an action, as a military operation or a move in a game) forming an integral part of a stratagem: a strategic move in a game of chess. STRATEGIC DRIFTBerchot - Demarque - Doncieux - Durand - Piva.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. The book is a well-argued case for the need for strategic agility in times of business turbulence.
It has also an interesting concept of a 'dual operating system', namely an agile network-type of organizational structure working in concert with the traditional corporate hierarchy.